SLIGHTLY OFF THE MARK
Here are
two of the main causes of problems with government in this country:
First,
there are those people who say there’s no point voting because it doesn’t make
a difference, then complain about the politicians other people vote in.
Second is
the fact that the public’s approval rating of Congress is 10%; yet in the 2012
election, 84% of the Senate incumbents and 85% of House incumbents held onto
their seats.
The first
is a product of not only frustration, but laziness. We don’t want to take the
time to research the candidates and choose the best one – or the least worst
one. We don’t want to support and encourage good candidates, and we don’t want
to go through the meat grinder of being candidates ourselves.
The second
is more revealing, and is a variation of the “not in my back yard” argument:
“Every member of Congress is worthless and criminal – except my Congressman.”
This is
where I usually start harassing you, dear reader, in an attempt to get out the
vote. If just six more of you had come out last election, I might still be a
member of the Town Council and enjoy franking privileges, the town car, the
private office and assistant, the Council swimming pool and skeet shooting
range …
Well. I got
a key to the municipal building, anyway.
The town is
in good hands without me, but the same can’t be said of Washington, D.C. Much
as we love to criticize the President, Congress has been outrageously,
stunningly awful. Part of this is due to partisan politics; part is due to a
remarkable lack of common sense, which many times causes partisan politics. We
call for moderation and compromise, which is fine – but if someone on one side
wants to do the worst possible thing for the country, should that second person
give in for the sake of compromise? Sometimes people are just plain wrong,
which I’ll grant you doesn’t solve the problem of gridlock.
You the
voter need to vote, because the fewer people who vote, the less Congressmen
worry about voters. The less they worry about voters, the more they can throw
money at what few voters there are and not worry about anything else. There is
no money, so that’s a problem.
You the
voter, if you don’t like how things are going in Congress, need to go to the
polls and vote the incumbents out. All of them. Republican, Democrat, Martian,
whatever, vote them out each and every time until they get the idea and work
for the people again. If you don’t, we’ll continue to be stuck with people
nobody likes, doing things nobody likes, with results nobody likes.
Did you
know that the Senate is required by law to pass a budget by April 15 every
single year? The problem is, they haven’t. For over three years. By definition,
our lawmakers are lawbreakers. Budget resolutions can pass with a simple
majority, so filibusters are no excuse.
And yet,
despite having no budget, the government manages to keep on spending money. As
of the moment I write this, the outstanding public debt is $16,198,734,633,000,
give or take a few bucks.
(I just checked
again, before sending this in. The amount is now $16,200,034,782.837.)
That’s
sixteen trillion dollars. TRILLION.
Congress
does nothing about this outrage, and why? Because we do nothing about them. And
why? Because too many of the people who bother to vote do it on the basis of,
“The rest of Congress is horrible, but my
congressman managed to bring in a bunch of money to our district!”
Money that
doesn’t exist. It just isn’t there. It’s a phantom, and the longer we refuse to
accept that, the worse the chickens are going to bite us when they come home to
roost. Or maybe they’ll lay eggs on us, whatever.
We’re
complacent in this, not only by not kicking them out but by actually approving
the status quo. How many times have you heard, “Well, the program to save
pregnant albino Appalachian tree frogs only costs $17 million. That’s hardly a
drop in the bucket of the federal budget.”
Good point.
Now, what happens when we add up all the other $17 million dollar payouts?
Suddenly we’ve got a budget.
Seventeen
million dollars is nothing? Not even
worth talking about? Have we come to this? Let me do some quick calculations:
Okay, at my present pay rate it would take me 4,857 years to make 17 million
bucks. How is that nothing?
In the
immortal words of that drunken guy on Independence
Day, “We have to stop them!” (He also said “Up yours!” which might also be
appropriate.)
Okay, I
went off on a monetary tangent. My point is that the power of the President is
out of control, largely because one of the other branches of government has
ceded much of their power to him (or her – this is not a one-time problem).
How
do-nothing is our current Congress? What are they doing to stop our race toward
the fiscal cliff, deal with various crises here and in other countries, and
generally do their job? Well, on October 9th, a lawmaker gaveled the
Senate into session … then gaveled it out, 25 seconds later. It was done just
to make things official – most of our elected officials were off running for
another election.
So, what do
we do?
Well, we’re
the employers of Congress. What do you do if your employee doesn’t show up for
work, takes long breaks when he does, doesn’t accomplish the job when he is
there, and to top it all off takes your money and spends it recklessly?
Oh, I don’t
know … fire them?
Vote, people. It’s our only chance to show them who’s supposed to be in charge, and we have to start somewhere.
And then there's Parliament, where our leaders can be found in contempt and yet shrug it off and browbeat any opposition into silence....
ReplyDeleteSeems like any large legislative body gets good at covering their tracks and ignoring the opposition after awhile.
Delete