Years ago I
did a review of movies just out on video, which I called “Amateur Armchair
Review” because … why not? I stopped because the paper apparently no longer
needed the filler, but you really miss me, don’t you? Go on, say it …
Fine. I’m
back anyway, because doing a regular review of new movies gives me an excuse to
go see new movies. I’m starting late with “Godzilla”, the reboot of my favorite
childhood monster movies. Instead of bad dubbing and a guy in a rubber suit we
get spectacular effects and excellent production values, but I liked it anyway.
Unlike the
last American attempt at the franchise, which I didn’t hate but also didn’t
like much, this version has the feel of a Japanese monster movie. That’s a
compliment, by the way. The biggest criticism I’ve seen is that the main
character just kind of floats through, letting things happen to him. That’s
true. At least, it’s true for the main human
character.
Aaron
Taylor-Johnson is Ford Brody, who reluctantly heads to Japan to bail out his
obsessed dad, Joe (Bryan Cranston … why do they never give acting Oscars for
monster movies?) Joe is obsessing over a nuclear accident that killed his wife
years ago, and it turns out Joe is right that the whole thing is a cover-up …
there’s a monster in them-there ruins.
But the
monster is not Godzilla, who at 60 was probably convalescing at the Old
Monster’s Home. It’s a MUTO (don’t ask), a giant monster that happens to wake
up just when our heroes break into the place. What are the chances?
Things go
south very quickly and soon Godzilla is chasing the MUTO, because he’s
apparently employed by Mother Nature to bring balance back to the Force, or
maybe I’m mixing up my franchises. Luckily Brody’s wife, played by Mary Kate
and Ashley Olsen’s less scary sister Elizabeth, is safe with their son all the
way across the Pacific, in San Francisco. The monsters will never end up there.
Will they?
This is not
the perfect monster movie, mostly because I’m not getting a cut. It’s true Ford
Brody tends to go along with whatever challenge tends to pop up in front of
him—and he certainly isn’t as much fun as the 1998 “Godzilla” character played
by Matthew Broderick, who along with a great cast was trapped in a movie with
no heart. (Could that be related to movie maker Roland Emmerich saying he
didn’t like the original Godzilla movies? That’s
who you want making one.)
Although
Brody manages to save the day in the end—somebody’s day—sort of—I suspect his
bouncing around was on purpose. Yes, he’s just trying to get back to his
family, and later protect them, but his and all human activity is a subplot. (And
sometimes not an interesting subplot.)
This isn’t about humanity, which to
the monsters is no more important than ants on the ground being trampled during
a fist fight. This is very much about humanity’s helplessness in the face of
forces of nature that care not a bit what people do. It’s a dark film, very
much a disaster movie, with absolutely mind-blowing special effects. But it
brings back the spirit of the original films, in a way that’s hard to explain.
And yeah,
for all the destruction, it’s fun. Don’t judge me.
My score,
going back to my old review days:
Oscar
potential: 3 ½ out of 4 M&M’s, if only for special effects, or the score.
Entertainment
value: 4 out of 4 M&M’s. The good green ones.
Next: I slice into the X-Men
Good review, Mark!
ReplyDeleteAnd yes, they'll never give an Oscar for a monster movie role.
Well, we can always hope!
Delete