Fans of L. Frank Baum’s Oz books often have mixed reactions to new Oz related projects. We want them to be faithful to the books, at a time when many people think Oz started four decades later with the MGM Judy Garland movie. On the other hand, we’re often happy to have any kind of Ozzie entertainment, even when we’re up in arms about how very un-Oz it can be.
So when Wicked comes along, or Oz: The Great and Powerful, or when the
characters pop up on “Once Upon a Time” or “Supernatural”, we hold our breath
and hope the creators get it right. Usually they don’t. (Dorothy is blonde,
darn it!)
Blonde Dorothy. See? I don't make this crap up. |
If they don’t get it right in our minds, the next question is to they get it right
in spirit? (After all, Dorothy wasn’t blonde in the first Oz book.) And failing that, did they at least give us an
entertaining project that keeps Oz in people’s minds?
Along
comes “Emerald City”. The first thing I heard about the project was that it
would be a “darker, edgier” look at Oz, at which point I began screaming and
tearing my hair out, and believe me, I don’t have hair to waste.
But having
said that, Baum himself often made Oz a dark place. In the first book Dorothy
and the gang kill two witches, two forest beasts that are intent on eating
them, and the Scarecrow even murders a murder of crows. In the second book an
army invades the Emerald City and takes over, and in the third a princess
decides to have Dorothy’s head cut off—to add to her collection. Come to think
of it, in the fourth (spoiler alert!) the Wizard burns down an entire country,
and cuts another guy in half, with a sword! Okay, the other guy was literally a
vegetable, but still.
So yeah,
maybe not such a leap. “Emerald City” was a pleasant surprise, although that
might be partially because I went in with low expectations.
There were
plenty of shout-outs for the book fans, starting right from the beginning when
one of the most important non-Dorothy characters show up—sort of. (Spoilers!) Still,
when they said “darker”, they weren’t kidding around.
Dorothy starts
out in Kansas with her aunt and uncle as in the book, but she’s grown up and
working in a hospital—and stealing drugs for her ailing Uncle Henry. But in
this version her mother is alive and has returned, living nearby but out of
contact with her daughter. When they finally meet again it’s in the midst of
both a tornado and a murder; Dorothy
dives into a police car for safety from both and finds herself—and the officer’s
K-9—lifted through some kind of space warp into a snowy wasteland where she
promptly runs someone down. Come on—you know who that someone is.
Things just
go downhill from there, as Dorothy immediately finds herself in the middle of
political intrigue and danger from all sides. At least the dog (In Oz dogs are
called “Toto”) likes her, as does the brainless straw-covered Christ-figure she
saves from crucifixion. Yeah, you heard that right—he’s even got a wound in his
side.
Sure enough,
Dorothy is on her way down the Yellow Brick Road, although in Mountainous
terrain full of death and destruction and people wanting to kill her. Meanwhile
the Wizard has taken control of Oz despite the hatred of the only two witches
left, there’s a frozen giant poised to destroy the witches’ temple, Dorothy may
have signed a death warrant for the little boy she “rescued”, and it’s all very
steampunk. It was about as far from the Oz books as you could get, and yet, in
a strange way, not.
I mean,
steampunk? Baum had an entire city that mechanically sank beneath a lake for
defense, and a mechanical man who literally had to be wound up to work.
Overall, I
liked it way more than I thought I would. The writers kept the pace moving, the
actors did great, and there was plenty of mystery and intrigue to go around.
Although the look was nothing like the Oz I’d imagine, the Spanish scenery was
certainly spectacular, as were the effects. Not a big fan of that much
darkness, though: I have a feeling we’ll see little or no of Baum’s humor in
this version.
There were
also hints that there are more secrets behind Dorothy than even she knows, and
I assume that’s going to come around again. I like that she was more like the
book Dorothy: not only caring but imaginative, determined, and not willing to
take crap.
That sounds like a very different take on Oz! Good review!
ReplyDeleteDifferent is all there is, these days!
DeleteThanks for the review. I really had my heart set on watching this but saw a scary, dark preview and read a nasty review which made me switch to Shark Tank which, in the end sounded closer to Baum's story.I vaguely remember being hooked on the books as a grade schooler and always saw it as a hopeful story of redemption.
ReplyDeleteI think they did a horrible job with the previews--the show was much better than what they let it on to be. However, much as I liked it, I wouldn't call it the "real" Oz; I read Baum's original 14 Oz books over and over again as a child, and as dark as he could be, he also had a lot of humor, and the tales were ultimately hopeful. That seems to be the way it is with Oz projects anymore--for some reason everyone feels it necessary to make them dark and violent.
DeleteI have no idea why they would call that the Emerald City. A curse on them. They could have called it something original just like the movie. Baum's Jack O'Lantern was not the most pleasant character.
ReplyDeleteBaum's Jack O' Lantern? I always thought Jack Pumpkinhead was fun and innocent, if also stupid. Of course, Baum had plenty of other characters that weren't very pleasant.
DeleteThere are a lot of shout-outs to the book series and the MGM movie, which I appreciate. Still, I'd like to see a project for adults that still keeps the characters and world as they originally were; I'll bet someone could have fun with that.