SLIGHTLY OFF THE MARK
Every now
and then a concept just makes me stop and gape in amazement. The designated
hitter, Joe Biden as Vice-President, a transistor radio you can listen to in
the shower …
Mostly terrible ideas. Ever try to
dance “Thriller” in the shower? Better have an anti-slip mat.
But this
one, which struck me as both a great and terrible idea, seemed even more
amazing:
Powdered alcohol.
Party in
your water bottle.
Apparently
this isn’t a new idea, but it was new to me. Everyone who remembers surfing the
internet for the first time understands how that goes. Back in the 70’s the
General Foods Corp. filed a patent for powdered alcohol, which they made by
absorbing ethanol into carbohydrate powder.
“But isn’t
too much carbohydrate bad for you?” Seriously, that’s your only health concern
with this?
This time
around a fellow named Mark Phillips decided having a bag of powdered alcohol
with you at all times would be a good idea, and came up with something he
called Palcohol. I could do a column just on that name. Phillips, who describes
himself as an “active guy”, wanted to have some fast booze dust available, to
wind down after a hard day of hiking, biking, or camping.
Heaven
forbid such activities would call for Gatorade.
But I know
many people who are incapable of calling a day fun unless they top it off with
the alcoholic beverage of their choice, so I understand where Phillips is
coming from. He developed six varieties of powdered alcohol: vodka, rum, and
four cocktails. Those last are Cosmopolitan, Mojito, Powderita (!) and Lemon
Drop, and shouldn’t that choice satisfy any extreme sports fan?
So what did
they miss? Well, what would many people want to hold under a garden hose after,
say, wrecking cars, blowing up outhouses, or shooting stop signs? That’s right:
Beer. You’d think that would be the easy one—don’t they actually make it with
carbohydrates?
So I hit
Google, and sure enough: powdered beer. The Beer Street Journal (no, that’s not
a typo), says the Alaskan company Pat’s Backcountry Beverages has created a
waterless beer that has flavor, aroma, and alcohol, and even bubbles thanks to
a carbonator bottle.
Again, just
to be clear: Not making this up.
But over
with the highbrow booze, Phillips ran into trouble. The Federal Government—you
know they’d show up in this tale—supposedly gave label approval to the dry
idea, but then said the approvals were issued in error. In a cloud of dust, the
ability to fill your pocket with vodka disappeared. Well, you could still do
it, but you’re in trouble if the plastic bag breaks.
The strange
thing about this is that a product like Palcohol would have gone through an
extensive permit process before ever getting to the label approval stage. This
was noted by Robert Lehrman, who runs a beverage law website and reported on
the idea of an extra-dry martini. Shaken, not blown.
Yes, a
beverage law website. Surely you’re not surprise?
Lehrman
thought this approval, followed by a rapid disproval, didn’t ring true. He
figured some lawmakers wanted more information before proceeding with the
approval.
Some people
are blaming Big Liquor for the delay. (I’ll let you insert your own joke,
there.) I think the lawmakers did the same thing I did: They saw “powdered
alcohol”, stopped in their campaigning tracks, and said, “Wha—? We need to
check this out.”
So now we
await the chance to always have a bag of booze in our hats, hidden in our
boots, or mixed with our Metamucil. Yeah, someday soon grandpa will be much
happier about his diet.
I’m of
mixed feelings about this, and on a related note, do the powder packets come
with little mixing sticks? And are the sticks hollow, so you can drink through
them? On the one hand, I don’t see how this will be abused any more than liquid
alcohol will, although it may make things easier. Any place that doesn’t allow
alcohol, but does allow soft drinks, will find imbibers experimenting with a
whole new taste sensation.
“How did
you like the movie, honey?”
“Bweaugh ….
Blaaaagh!”
“So Quentin
Tarintino makes you sick, too?”
But I
suppose if somebody really wants to act stupid and make dumb comments in
public, they’ll either carry one of those little flasks of liquid or run for
Congress. My bigger concern (and this doesn’t apply to Congress) is not how
they’ll harm others, but how they’ll harm themselves.
The best
example: The product’s website warns people that the alcohol powder should not
be snorted.
Great. Tell people who can’t wait to drink not to do something stupid.
Like sucking liquid beer thru a straw.
ReplyDeletePersonally, I hate beer -- straw or not!
DeleteNow if I could buy powdered fish and chips that would be really worth googling for.
ReplyDeleteI'm not sure rehydrating that would go well.
DeleteNonsense, they just realized they forgot to stick a high liquor tax on powder. If it is "approved" again, it will be taxed like the other liquid potables. Of course, when we went camping (long, long ago), Lanny always had his beer and whiskey along. No one dared touch it until evening. He was known to knock a can of beer out of a person's hand if they were drinking before hunting.
ReplyDeleteI think a severe reaction to drinking before hunting is appropriate!
DeleteJust wait: someone will mix it in with cocaine, and thus snort palcohcaine.
ReplyDeleteIf they haven't already ...
DeleteGood thing you mention that disclaimer about not snorting it since California's got a water shortage--anything is possible.
ReplyDeleteEspecially in California!
Deleteomg, now I've heard of everything - until your next post. I can think of a lot of people who'd like these products. "I haven't been drinking occifer. See? No alcohol on me." "Then why are you wavering?" "Must be the wind."
ReplyDeleteSome people will try anything!
Delete