SLIGHTLY OFF THE MARK
There’s
some irony in the fact that I’m not as thrilled about naked people on TV now as
I was decades ago, when it was almost impossible to find any.
When cable
TV first came to Albion, it excited people in many ways. You could see music
videos! You could watch movies on Home Box Office, almost as if you had a box
office in your home! They had an entire channel devoted to the weather! How cool is that?
Another
exciting thing was that you could see the channel at all. If you happened to
live in a bad place for receiving signals over the airwaves, you could swear
every TV show took place in a blizzard. When I was a kid, if you wanted to go
from watching three Fort Wayne TV stations to the two more or less visible
South Bend stations, you had to physically go outside and move the entire pole
the antenna was on.
I’m not
making this up, you whippersnappers.
But without
a doubt, the channel that most excited people of my age was a pay channel
called Cinemax. Why? Well, we called it Skinemax, which should give you a clue.
The first
movie I ever saw on HBO was Star Wars.
The first movie I ever saw on Cinemax was H.O.T.S.,
which according to a character in the trailer meant “Hold On To Sex”. Young
college woman—who seemed just a little old for college—went topless in this
movie. No tops! It also had a plot … I assume.
Nudity on
TV!
Now it’s
hanging out all over the place.
In fact,
there’s a trend on basic cable channels, which are already showing things that
thirty years ago you’d have to pay extra for. The trend: Take reality shows
that already exist, do them over without clothes, and see the ratings
skyrocket.
Take the
dating show, for instance. Instead of waiting to see if they’ll get naked at
the end of the date, strip ‘em before they even meet. It’s, yep, “Dating
Naked”.
Take a
typical show about a young couple shopping for the perfect home. Instead of
stripping the furnishings, strip the couple, and you have “Buying Naked”.
They’re nudists, you see.
The newest
is “Skin Wars”, about artists who paint on nude models. But are the artists
also nude? It’s only fair.
Then
there’s my favorite: Take a typical survivor show, but have a man and woman in
the buff. It’s called “Naked And Afraid”. Wouldn’t you be afraid if your nether
regions were directly exposed to everything from mosquitos to poison ivy?
I’ve seen
bits and pieces of “Naked And Afraid”—pardon the expression. Some contestants
immediately find something to cover their unmentionables, flying in the face
(pardon the expression) of the whole point. It’s like H.O.T.S. with everyone wearing a Mumu.
The
producers are quick to insist that these shows are not about nudity, and one
even insisted that “Naked and Afraid” was a family show.
Well, yeah,
if your family lives in the Sunnyside Up Nudist Colony. But let’s face it, the
real point of these shows isn’t that people should be comfortable with their
bodies: It’s that sex sells.
As I’ve
gotten older, I’ve become interested in plot and characterization. While these
shows do indeed have characters, the blurring out of certain body part areas
seems to negate the real reason to watch them. Still, it’s a trend that’s not
going away as long as there’s money to be made at it. I predict that within the
next ten years, nudity will go from rare to common on broadcast TV, too.
Imagine, on “Home Improvement”, how much more damage Tim Taylor would have done
to himself in the buff. Imagine how much easier it would have been for “Buffy
The Vampire Slayer” to kill monsters if they were too busily ogling her body to
mount a defense.
Let’s take
a look at how current TV shows would handle this:
“The Big
Bang Theory”. The genius nerds see neighbor Penny naked every day, turning them
into slobbering idiots who can’t turn a car key, let alone work out physics
equations. As a result they all lose their jobs except for Sheldon, who’s only
bothered by how unsanitary the whole thing is.
“American
Idol”. We get still more proof that for what it takes to become a popular
singer, looks matter as much as ability.
“Dancing
With The Stars”. Injuries during practice become much more serious.
“Grey’s
Anatomy”. The name gets changed to “Everyone’s Anatomy”.
“Resurrection”.
Now sponsored by Viagra.
“Marvel’s
Agents of SHIELD”. Agent Coulson strips off that perfectly tailored suit to
reveal … a perfectly tailored suit. At the network, the suits are puzzled.
“Survivor”.
Pretty much nothing changes.
In all
those crime shows with scenes set in morgues and labs, the characters will be way more careful with the scalpels. You
just watch and see.
And I’m sure you will.
I imagine everyone on Grey's Anatomy has pretty much seen the anatomy of everyone else by this point...
ReplyDeleteI watched the whole first season ... and never saw a single episode after that. I have no explanation.
DeleteSetting aside humor here. As the moral decay fills the propaganda box, I've been less inclined to watch mine. In fact, I've considered getting rid of it. But I'm a Resurrection and Walking Dead fan. Other than that, I listen to on-line podcasts.
ReplyDeleteI would argue with you ... except I agree completely, so ...
DeleteWe have somewhere in the area of 15 shows we watch regularly, and they seem to be little islands with insipidness splashing all around them.
Same here, although I do watch Naked and Afraid. It was much better the first season when the "survivalists" actually tried to survive, as opposed to sitting around whining and starving for three weeks. Dual Survival was much better in that regard, but I think it got canceled.
DeleteWere it not for NCIS I'd get rid of it. 100 channels and bugger all to watch.
ReplyDeleteWe have a package that gives us the Science, Military, Smithsonian, BBC America, and History2 Channels among others ... for an extra three bucks a month, that's where we spend most of our TV watching time.
Delete